Verification of EB PeleC

Verification of the EB capability in PeleC follows several different paths in order to ensure the widest coverage of scenarios. A short description and the source code for these test cases are included below.

2 Summary of EB cases (H=hydro, D=diffusion, S=species transport, R=reactions)

Description	Type	H	D	S	R
C1. Method of manufactured solutions for EB	convergence	x	x
TODOC Quiescent flow on EB cylinder intersect with sphere	maintain zero flow	x	x	x
C3. Zero dimensional ignition with embedded boundaries	ignition delay	x			x
TODOC Case 2 but isothermal EB at 310K, flow at 300K outflow BC	steady-state should be 310K	x	x	x
TODOC Quiescent flow on EB tilted plane but with case 4 BC	examine transient	x	x	x
TODOC 3 orthogonal planes, not centered on grid, species diffusion with different BC	testing homog. neu. at the species EB	x	x	x
C7. Sod shock tube in rotated channel with AMR	analytic left/right states	x
C8. Multi-species shock tube in a rotated channel with AMR	literature	x		x
C9. Acoustic wave in cylindrical channel	analytical	x
C10. Hagen–Poiseuille flow	analytical	x	x
TODOC Multi-species shock tube with end box	literature	x	x	x
C12. Smooth periodic problem	analytical	x	x
C13. Supersonic vortex study	analytical	x
C14. Shock interacting with a ramp	literature	x
Converging Nozzle Case	analytical	x

• C1. Method of manufactured solutions for EB
  • Case description
  • \(L_2\) error norm of fields
  • Running study
• C3. Zero dimensional ignition with embedded boundaries
  • Case description
  • The embedded boundary used in the zero dimensional ignition case
  • Comparison of temperature transients between Cantera and PeleC
• C7. Sod shock tube in rotated channel with AMR
  • Case description
  • Density at t=0.1s
  • Field profiles in the centerline at t=0.1s
  • Running study
• C8. Multi-species shock tube in a rotated channel with AMR
  • Case description
  • AMR mesh indicating refinement at embedded boundary, contact and shock discontinuities
  • Field profiles in the centerline at t=0.2 L sqrt(rhoL/pL)
• C9. Acoustic wave in cylindrical channel
  • Case description
  • Acoustic pulse at \(t=0.000625s\)
  • Density profiles in the centerline at \(t=0.000625s\)
  • \(L_2\) error norm of density
  • Running study
• C10. Hagen–Poiseuille flow
  • Case description
  • Velocity profiles at \(x=6\) cm (channel center)
  • \(L_2\) error norm of velocity
  • Time convergence of kinetic energy
  • Running study
• C12. Smooth periodic problem
  • Case description
  • Density profiles in centerline
  • \(L_2\) error norm of density
  • Running study
• C13. Supersonic vortex study
  • Case description
  • Density
  • Magnitude of velocity
  • Pressure
  • Running study
• C14. Shock interacting with a ramp
  • Case description
  • Pressure
  • Running study
• Converging Nozzle Case
  • Case description
  • Property Comparisons to Quasi-1D Flow
  • Effect of Boundary Conditions
  • Running study